Valley Journal
Valley Journal

This Week’s e-Edition

Current Events

Latest Headlines

What's New?

Send us your news items.

NOTE: All submissions are subject to our Submission Guidelines.

Announcement Forms

Use these forms to send us announcements.

Birth Announcement
Obituary

Overprotected?

Area ranchers fear fallout of wolf relisting as calving season approaches

Hey savvy news reader! Thanks for choosing local. You are now reading
1 of 3 free articles.



Subscribe now to stay in the know!

Already a subscriber? Login now

While the new year may bring thoughts of new starts and prosperity to many, 2011 looks to be a tough year for area ranchers as the number of livestock killed by wolves continues to rise.

Last year saw over 100 cattle lost to grey wolves in Montana, a number that looks to rise in 2011 as ranchers are no longer allowed to respond to wolves attacking their livestock.

The relisting of the grey wolf as an endangered species in the Northern Rockies has left local ranchers facing a difficult situation. While the wolf population has continually grown in the area since the reintroduction of the animal in the area in the 1980’s, ranchers now must once again face stiff restrictions that limit their ability to respond to the increasing loss of livestock to the animal.

According to the Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks website, the number of confirmed cattle deaths caused by wolves was higher last year than in previous years, with over 100 head lost in 2010, but ranchers in northern Montana are still restricted from killing or even harassing wolves that attack their livestock.

Terry Murphy, president of the Western Montana Stockmen’s Association, says that the situation caused by the relisting of wolves as an endangered species is a scary one for northern Montana’s ranchers.

“If they (wolves) are in our pastures killing our cattle, there is not a thing we can legally do about it ourselves. That is very scary for us,” Murphy said. “The problem is that it hasn’t been long enough for us to really see the long-term effects of this. In this deep snow, it is only going to get worse when calving season gets into full swing.”

The problem for area ranchers began Aug. 5, 2010, when U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy of Missoula overturned a 2009 decision that removed wolves from the endangered species list in Montana, Idaho and Wyoming. The ruling was based on a two-part argument, one side being that the federal Endangered Species Act does not allow the federal government to subdivide a animal’s population so that an animal is protected in one area and not protected in another. According to Molloy’s ruling, wolves must either be listed or not listed as one whole unit throughout the Northern Rockies region. The second argument that led to the August relisting was that the current Wyoming wolf management plan was deemed inadequate to meet federal guidelines for the delisting of wolves from the endangered species list.

The effect of the delisting was immediate for northern Montana’s ranchers. With wolves back on the endangered species list, private citizens are no longer allowed to kill or harass wolves that are attacking their livestock or domestic dogs. In fact, the only time a person in northern Montana is allowed to kill or harass a wolf is if the animal is in self-defense or in the defense of others.

While ranchers are not permitted to respond to wolves attacking their livestock, there is a compensation program currently in place through the state that will play them for the loss of animals due to wolf attack. 

According to Murphy, the program is not 100 percent effective, though.

“The biggest problem we have going right now is that in order to get compensated for a loss, you have to have a confirmed kill,” he said. “The problem is, a study out of Idaho recently showed that for every confirmed kill there are another seven wolf kills that go unconfirmed.”

The Montana Livestock Loss Reduction and Mitigation Program, which pays the ranchers for their losses, began in 2008. In 2009, the program paid $141,462 in claims for confirmed losses to predators. 

Another problem, according to Murphy, is that the program is out of money to compensate ranchers until July, 2011. 
 
In 2009, wolves were responsible for 97 cattle deaths, 202 sheep deaths and the losses of four llamas, four dogs and two goats in Montana. While the numbers for 2010 have not yet been released, the numbers look to be nearly the same.
 
While the delisting of wolves helped lead to a drop in the Montana wolf population between 2009 and 2010, that number of wolves will more than likely increase with the animal back under federal protection.
 
The final count for 2009 put the Montana wolf population at 524 with 101 packs and 37 breeding pairs, compared to 2010’s preliminary numbers of 400 wolves, 96 packs and 32 breeding pair. The problem, though, is that the preliminary numbers have always been 5-10% below the end of the year counts.
 
The Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks Department currently breaks the wolf population down into three control areas, with the northwest park of the state having, by far, the largest wolf population. Wolf Management Unit One, classified as northwest Montana, contained 308 wolves in 64 packs with 23 breeding pairs at last count while Unit Two (western Montana) had 110 wolves in 20 packs with five breeding pairs and Unit Three (Southwestern Montana) had 106 wolves in 17 packs with nine breeding pairs.
 
With ranchers restricted from killing or harassing wolves, the question now is how do they protect their stock while still obeying the law? There are several non-lethal ways to deter wolves, including electric fences, guarding and herding animals, an increased human presence, night pens and light or siren warning devices. The problem is that all of these deterrents cost money. 
 
“Sure, you can put up electric fences and such. It is extremely effective, but it is also very costly,” Murphy said.
 
The problems for ranchers do not end there, though. With wolves back on the endangered species list, the only people authorized to deal with wolves are agents of the Fish, Wildlife and Parks Department. The problem is that there are not enough agents to go around, with one agent called upon to cover multiple counties.
 
“With just one person to cover such a large area, the wolves could easy put a rancher out of business,” Murphy said. “If they get into your calving field, without compensation, you could be ruined.”
 
With a population large enough to be causing so much trouble, many people are asking why wolves need to be back on the endangered species list. According to Murphy, it may not be logic that is guiding the government’s decisions.
 
“The politics of the Green movement are phenomenal. The original intent of the Endangered Species Act was to save animals from extinction. Now, it has been turned into a tool for political gain,” he said. “Now they think that the West has to be saved from the Westerners.
The other thing is that environmental groups raise millions of dollars every year. It’s big business. When it boils down to it, this whole situation is about money. Saving wolves means a lot of money for the environmental groups and their lawyers.”
 
Whatever the reasoning for putting wolves back on the endangered species list, one thing is for certain: If wolves remain on the endangered list, 2011 is going to be a long year for northwest Montana’s ranchers.

Sponsored by: