Valley Journal
Valley Journal

This Week’s e-Edition

Current Events

Latest Headlines

What's New?

Send us your news items.

NOTE: All submissions are subject to our Submission Guidelines.

Announcement Forms

Use these forms to send us announcements.

Birth Announcement
Obituary

MSGA celebrates Supreme Court’s WOTUS case decision

Hey savvy news reader! Thanks for choosing local. You are now reading
1 of 3 free articles.



Subscribe now to stay in the know!

Already a subscriber? Login now

News from the Montana Stockgrowers Association

HELENA — The Montana Stockgrowers Association (MSGA) shares its excitement and relief as the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision to the most recent Waters of the United States (WOTUS) case. Last week, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous 9-0 holding and ruled in favor of the Sacketts, finding their wetlands are not federally jurisdictional. Sackett v. EPA is the Court’s fourth consideration of which waters are federally jurisdictional as WOTUS. 

“Today’s opinion is a landmark decision for ranchers as the decision establishes the reach of the Clean Water Act. MSGA has been an active opponent of this type of regulatory overreach and today’s holding is a significant victory,” stated John Grande, MSGA president. “Not only does this opinion reject the significant nexus, which the 2023 Biden WOTUS definition is based on, it also will require the entire rule to be pulled back and extensive revisions will need to occur.”

The Sacketts, owners of an excavation company in the Idaho Panhandle, sought to build a home on property along Priest Lake. To prepare the lot for construction, the Sacketts began to fill it with gravel. In 2007, EPA officials intervened and demanded they stop construction after determining that the Sacketts’ lot contained a federally protected wetland. Under the authority granted to it by the Clean Water Act, the agency ordered the couple to remove the gravel and cease any further construction. The Sacketts sued in 2008, and the case began its journey through the federal court system for the next 15 years, ending at the Supreme Court. Their attorneys argued that the wetland the Sacketts filled is not, jurisdictionally, a “water of the United States,” and thus not subject to EPA regulation.

Sponsored by: